Friday, October 31, 2014

The Scattered: Spiritual Reasons for Black Failure

This essay is directed toward persons who are of black African descent and toward all observant Jews and Christians. If you don't fall into these categories, that's fine and it's okay if you comment, but for you, the premises on which this essay is based don't apply. 
We watch as set after set after set of black Americans blunder short-sightedly, most recently in Ferguson, MO, and in nearby St. Louis and it gives me one basic feeling. Fatigue. 
I am tired. Tired of the stupid stuff. Tired of the desire for Selbstmord. That last word is German for 'suicide,' and, to me, since I occasionally think in German, it is more descriptive of what I have in mind: not personal suicide, nor even group suicide. Selbstmord connotes--at least in my mind--the psychosis behind following after those who would help your death along and the demonization of those who want to save you--even those of your own number who don't want to follow you into oblivion.
What the Hell is this...this insanity...about?
Like many others, I’ve considered the perennial plight of black African-descended persons and occasionally wondered whether it is due to some defect in our nature or plain old "bad luck." But, I refuse to believe that God assigns differing potential IQs for different ethnic groups and I don't believe in luck. However, if those notions are discounted, then what is left?

A proper perspective; it’s difficult thing to gain, for many reasons. When considering the truth of a matter, perspectives can take many sizes, shapes, and agendas; some straight, some skewed; others -centric, -phobic, or -supremacist; still others too large or too narrow. 

But what about spiritual perspective? Why do we--especially we who are Christians--not view the plight of black African-descended persons from a biblical perspective, especially considering that black persons are specifically mentioned in the Bible?

Answer: because we don't want to. We Christians tend to ignore what God says about black persons in the Bible, and we do so out of two emotions which God says are sins: pride and fear. Well, I'm tired of both of those emotions, in myself and in others, so, Christians, let's walk in truth, without fear and with humility. If we believe that the Bible contains narratives which are true, let's face them and let's walk in that truth.

What the Bible Says

The plight of black people is documented in the book of Genesis and that plight is the result of the disobedience of two of our forefathers--and the consequences of that disobedience have lasted for four thousand years.

If we accept that the sons of Noah were the first to be separated by race and that Ham is the father of the black race, we have but to read and comprehend. So let's read first.

20 And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard:
21 And he drank of the wine and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent.
22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his brethren without.
23 And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father’s nakedness.
24 And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.
25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.
26 And he said, Blessed be the Lord God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. 
27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.

6 And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim and Phut, and Canaan.
7 And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Haviah, and Sabtah, and Raamah, and Sathchah: and the sons of Raamah; Sheba, and Dedan.
8 And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth.
9 He was a mighty hunter before the Lord: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the Lord.
10 And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel and Erech, and Accad and Calneh, in the land of Shinar.

1 And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
2 And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.
3 And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime they had for morter.
4 And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.
5 And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded.
6 And the Lord said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.
7 Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.
8 So the Lord scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.
9 Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the Lord did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the Lord scatter them abroad upon the face of the earth.

From these passages, and from what we know of the subsequent history of Africa and black African-descended persons, we can only conclude that black people were scattered on purpose. The whole reason that Nimrod built the Tower was to keep his people from being scattered--in direct disobedience to God. So when God confounded their languages, they ended up being scattered anyway and remain so up until today. And every misfortune, every curse, which has befallen black people as a whole is a result of that disobedience in one form or another. We have never wanted to admit this. But if we are indeed the children of Ham, how can we look at the last four millennia of African history and the history of African-descended persons on other continents and believe otherwise?

Are we cursed via the curse of Canaan? Yes. But the curse of Canaan affects only a small portion of Ham’s descendents—he had other children, as mentioned. However, we are largely cursed through this means, this act of pride and hubris from Ham’s grandson, Nimrod, whose name means ‘rebel.’ The Bible history of black African-descended persons explicitly spells out the terms of the Canaanite curse and the terms of the Babel curse are implied: the scattering. 

I submit that any black African or anyone of black African descent who is not covered by the atoning blood of Jesus the Christ is still under the terms of the Babel scattering and the Canaanite curse and will still feel the battering of them.

Through the Babel scattering, the entire earth began to speak in different languages, but, in my opinion, the brunt of it fell on Nimrod’s people. One look at the hundreds of languages existing on the African continent makes that plain. If God blesses a people, can He not curse them? To deny the latter is to deny many other Biblically-recorded blessings and curses by God upon other peoples.

God, being merciful, decided to take the terms and effects of these curses and use them to provide the opportunity to lift the curses on some of us by showing us how to be saved. He did this by allowing us to go into captivity into two areas of Christianity: Europe and North America. It is in both of those places that many of our ancestors first heard the Gospel, believed it, accepted it, and relied upon it; and, conversely, it is how we were rescued from the curses and the main snare of the Enemy: idolatry—the chief form of which is known as Islam.

Most black people, even those who say they are Christians, don’t want to look too far back into the dismal history of our African ancestors because focusing on it tends to support the long-held allegation that we are genetically inferior to other races. The "inferiority" is not genetic, but spiritual. And the mistake that many have made in researching Africa and Africans isn’t only that many don’t go far enough back in history. 

There are more fundamental mistakes: we don’t want to accept the Word of God as history, and, on top of that, we don’t want to accept the judgment of God for the actions of our ancestors. Acknowledging that the judgment exists is the first step toward grabbing hold to the dismissal of that judgment: accepting Jesus the Christ as Lord and Savior. If we don’t take the first step, we find ourselves blundering through our lives as individuals and as a people.

A Comparison With Another People
2 And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:
3 And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.

These were God’s words to Abram, whom He later renamed Abraham. Of course, that great nation is Israel, aka the Israelites, Hebrews, or Jews. (And let's not forget that God has punished the Jews more than once for disobedience.)

But if God blessed the Hebrews to be His beacon to the world—to send His Son down to earth as one of them—why should God’s curses not be in effect when another people remain outside of the Lifter of curses, Jesus the Christ, the one to whom God refers to in this line: "in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed?

The Scattering 

The enemy was the author of the Babel scattering and he is the author of scattered thinking--confusion. Confusion produces chaotic action. We have but to look at the aftermath of the Babel scattering to see how our forefathers' actions have affected us. 
  • Hundreds of different languages on the African continent, resulting in
  • Forgetting the Living God and turning to idolatry
  • Tribalism (enslaving and massacring each other) and as a result, failure to unite against invaders from other continents—mainly Islamic
  • Enslaved and nearly wiped out (through the killing and castration of black men and boys) by the Islamic Civilization; joining with Islam in order to save ones skin and becoming slavers of other black Africans themselves, which softened the continent up for
  • Enslavement by Europeans and Americans, and
  • Colonization of most of the African continent by Europeans. (Ironic that the western version of slavery and subsequent colonization likely kept Islamic slavers from wiping black Africans out, the 19th century crimes of King Leopold's Belgium notwithstanding.)
And the present
  • AIDS, Ebola and other epidemics (much of the deadliness of these plagues is due to primitive, idolatrous practices)
  • Tribal wars continue
  • Islamic genocide, enslavement and colonization continues
  • Colonization by China
America
  • After slavery, second-class American citizenship (Jim Crow and other black codes) lasting until the mid-twentieth century
  • My (step) dad, 72 years old, says that his generation of black Americans failed the succeeding generations by failing to instill the love of the Living God in them--a characteristic which sustained black Americans through slavery and through legislated discrimination. According to Dad, it was his generation of black Americans which was the first to reach adulthood in real freedom. They could obtain real education, get real jobs, live where and how they wanted—they had freedom of choice, but most of them made the wrong choices, the chief being the abandonment of real Christianity and Christian value of the family. Black women were lured by the government into widespread harlotry, which funded them when they had children without being married. This nearly universal phenomenon has resulted in,
  • Not recognizing the re-enslavement (dependence on the children of Shem and Japheth)—the terms of the Canaanite curse. In fact, we view the New Slavery as our just due.
  • Black criminality out of proportion with the rest of the population
  • Self-contempt resulting in black-on-black murders and abortion far out of proportion
  • Contempt for all other races resulting in mindless brutality for sport (Newsome-Christian Murders, Wichita Massacre e.g. the knock-out game)
  • Feral gangs of black youth
  • Robberies and burglaries resulting in most homes in black neighborhoods with barred windows
  • Internalized inferiority and anti-intellectualism resulting in the widespread idea that a black person who does well in school and in life through legal means is "not really black"
  • Drug use far outside of proportion
  • Venereal diseases far outside of proportion
  • Women behaving like men and vice versa (more than just a reference to homosexuality)
  • Hard-heartedness; self-centeredness
  • Oath-breakers; believers in subjective definitions for words and concepts
  • Nasty attitudes; not bothering to subscribe to the rules of politeness and not teaching those rules to the children
Just for the sake of argument, let’s assume that the Biblical phenomena to which I've referred are not connected with the black race. Looking back in our history—and observing our present—how could we tell the difference? 

How God’s Judgment on Black People is Related to God’s Judgment on America

Rabbi Jonathan Cahn, a Messianic Jew, published the much-acclaimed novel, The Harbinger, in 2012. In the fictionalization, he points to ancient Israel’s downfall--a curse from God--as a result of that nation turning away from God and shows how that pattern relates to the USA as a result of that nation turning away from God since the Supreme Court decision of 1963 which put Yahweh out of the public sphere. 

God warned ancient Israel what would happen to it if it fell to idolatry and the curses were many, but one stands out in relation to my topic.

43 The stranger [foreigner] that is within thee shall get up above thee very high; and thou shalt come down very low.

Ancient Israel turned away from God many times, but He gave them chance after chance to repent. But at some point, God had enough and gave them no more chances (for a while). After the downfall of ancient Israel, the prophet Jeremiah laments the many consequences, including the following.

8 Servants have ruled over us: there is none that doth deliver us out of their hand.

Barack Hussein Obama was elected President of the United States in 2008 and reelected in 2012. And while there are many questions yet to be answered about his citizenship, background, and heritage, one thing is for certain: he is of black African descent. (In spite of the well-circulated, but culturally ignorant assertion that President Obama’s alleged biological father is mostly Arab, one look at a photograph of the latter refutes this, as does real research into the ethnic group of the Obamas: the Luo tribe.)

There has been much speculation that the president is not a Bible-believing Christian due to a ton of circumstantial evidence and one large piece of solid evidence: his twenty-year membership at Chicago’s Trinity Church, where the doctrine subscribed to is Black Liberation Theology.

If it is true that Barack Obama is not a US citizen and not real Christian and that black persons who are not covered by the blood of Jesus the Christ remain cursed to be slaves and servants to the children of Shem and Japheth, then Barack Obama—the stranger, the servant--is one of the curses on America for turning away from Him! Adding to this theory is that Barack Obama is the 44th President of the United States. The Biblical number for judgment is 44. 

It should be stressed that, were a black American, Bible-believing Christian to become the President of the United States, none of this would apply.

The hidden elite powers that rule this world—who have no religion other than worship of the Enemy--believe that all blacks should be killed. They believe that we are inferior and are a trash race of no use to the ascending New World Socialist Order which they plan on ruling and the course of our history seems to prove them correct.

But I suspect that the actual reasons that the earthly powers and principalities want to be rid of the black race are twofold: 1) The black failure at Babel—caused by lack of secrecy--to successfully infiltrate the Kingdom of their enemy—Yahweh—and the four millennia-long result, and 2) they recognize that blacks are a physically and spiritually gifted people. These powers fear what would happen if blacks as a whole were to nullify the Canaanite curse and the Babel scattering by accepting the Redemption of and submitting to the Lordship of Jesus the Christ. I think that we have the spiritual tools to be a powerful weapon for Jesus’ coming Kingdom. So it is that the blacks have been long targeted by the Enemy and his human servants, including black ones--to be enslaved, to facilitate the enslavement of their brethren, to scatter their own progeny (through eschewing of marriage) and, finally, to murder their own flesh. The last has been going on in earnest since 1973. 

Assuming that any or all of my conclusions are true, what are we to do with this information? That’s easy. Getting out and preach the actual Gospel—the Good News that Jesus the Christ died for us and rose again and sits at the right hand of Yahweh, His Father—can still be done freely, though one wonders how much longer that will last.

The difficulty lies in penetrating the layers of pride that have been indoctrinated into the black American psyche. The idea that any type of pride is anything less than a sin is one of the great deceptions put forth by the Enemy. The notion of Black Pride has resulted in a two-pronged idiocy: 

1) that anything said about the black race must always be positive, and 
2) that anything negative said about the black race is a result of racism or self-hatred, depending on the speaker. Veracity has no bearing on the latter. Neither does genocide. 

Saying what needs saying takes faith, courage, humility and wisdom. All of these attributes are gifts of Yahweh for the asking, but they begin with the fear of God. 

I asked, and this essay was the result. I am no Bible scholar, nor am I a historian. I’ve simply taken what I know, what I’ve read, what I’ve seen, and put those things together at the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. And I’m willing to be told that I’m wrong and to have the reasons explained to me.

*All biblical quotes are KJV.

RELATED: Azealia Banks Perfectly Agrees With My Scattered Post

Read my column at Da Tech Guy Blog on Tuesdays and Saturdays.
Please contribute to Juliette’s Projects: A Roof Over My Head, my new novel, this blog, and my Internet--to keep them going and to the COFFEE fund to keep me going!




Monday, October 6, 2014

Monday, May 19, 2014

My April 2014 DaTechGuyBlog Columns (Plus a Bit of March)

Just so you know...I've been busy; I post at DaTechGuyBlog every Tuesday and Saturday, NLT 4PM PT as one of Da Magnificent Seven. Don't miss tomorrow's column!

I'll post the entirety of May's work at the end of the month. In the meantime, read these posts and posts from the other six Magnificent Ones.

Who's Abridging What?
4/29

Salad Snob
4/26

The Great Indoctrination
4/22

Weapon of War 2014
4/19

The Difference Between the Destination and the Journey
4/15

Hoffer's Prophecy
4/12

People of the Lie
4/5

Creativity
4/1

What That Ebony Mag-RNC Thing Was Really About
3/29

The Price of Woof Tickets
3/25

Too Tired
3/22

You People
3/18

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

What's Growing in Your Garden?

Originally posted at Da Tech Guy Blog on January 28, 2014. 

Over at Ace of Spades HQ, my friend Monty expounds on a concept which I coined a number of years ago at my old blog and mentioned in an earlier Da Tech Guy post: The Coconut Treatment.
There is a price to be paid for divorcing actions and concepts from the words that describe them. Government, and the law that undergirds it, is made up of words. Devalue the words, strip them of meaning, and you do the same thing to the concepts those words describe. Action follows Thought, and for Thought to exist there must be the Word.
The sundering of meaning from the words to which they are assigned is merely a foundation for the hollowing out of the Old Order of things great and small. It is a demonic seed which mirrors the mustard seed concept of the Kingdom of Heaven as illustrated by Jesus the Christ.

Where God is the author of Order, he who wishes to be His counterpart sows the Tree of Chaos. Meet the New Boss.

Seeds require nourishment in order to flourish. And just as the seed of Faith will flourish with items recommended—prayer, reading God’s Word, fasting, giving, and obedience to God—so it is with the seed of Lies.

In his short, excellent post, Monty references Orwell’s Newspeak coinage, but the concept is much older than 1984it’s one which started very simply in the Garden when the Enemy planted doubt about the truth of God’s Word. Since then, the war has been ongoing and the enemy has always been able to find foot-soldiers--individuals, groups and nations—who will water his tree of Lies.

That tree has a fancy and useful name now—postmodernism--but it is merely the tool used to deceive mankind and, ultimately, to separate as many of us as possible from our Creator.

Primary Example: Love

God defines three types of love--agape, phileo and eros—and these definitions have a special order in that the third is meaningless without the first two. [Edit: there is also sorge--familial love.]

The new Love has a two-pronged definition: 1) giving a person whatever he/she wants, and 2) approving anything another wants to do. Its basis leads back to the disobedience in the Garden.

And from the seed planted by the new definition of love we get the conceptual fruit: new definitions for rights, racism, oppression…the list is endless.

The fruit and the branches are manifold. From the new “love” seed we get conceptual trees such as communism/progressivism/Marxism/socialism, “settled” science, and the Common Core(d) method of education—concepts with evil foundations and self-contradictory foundations or those in which foundations are unnecessary.

What to do? I’ve mentioned the solution in almost every one of my posts here [sic] at Da Tech Guy blog. But the first thing to do is recognize the faulty seeds which have been planted in oneself and to root them out. The usual evil seed which needs weeding is that same one which got the Enemy thrown out of Heaven: pride.

According to God, pride is always a sin. This includes pride of race, pride of ethnicity, pride of gender, pride of accomplishment, pride of relation, pride of nationality (yes)—many types of pride which we erroneously view as harmless or even good. That view is a seed for the larger tree: the “bad” types of pride; they all supersede the hand of the Dispenser of all good things. (To turn another concept on its head, you didn't build that. God did.)

So, I suggest that we each start with letting God remove the weeds from our individual souls—rebuilding the foundation of Truth in our individual thinking. In turn follows the larger removal of weeds from our families, and, after that, from our nation.

The weeding and watering have to start somewhere.






Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Sunday, January 26, 2014

God Does What He Wants

Does God make exceptions to His rules for humankind? Whether He does or not is the overarching theme of a friendly contention for the faith--also known as argument--that I've been having with several Christian men in regard to women being pastors of churches.

First let's cite the relevant passages:

34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law.

--1 Corinthians 14:34 (KJV)

Clearly, the apostle Paul did not want women to be leaders in churches or to even speak--or so it appears. But what are we to make of the following verse?

35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.

The words 'woman' and 'wife' are the same in the Hebrew language of the Old Testament and the Greek of the New Testament. One has to know the context of the verse and chapter to know which one the writer means. Which one is Paul referring to?

Here's a clue. Paul tells the Corinthian men to tell the women to ask their husbands questions at home if they want to learn anything about the church. So who will the women who are not married ask? Who will widows go to in order to learn about being saved? What about the unmarried daughters?

Or could it be that Paul was referring only to the wives of the men in the Corinthian church?

And if Paul wanted no women to be deacons, what are we to make of these words written by him?

1 I commend unto you Phebe our sister, which is a servant of the church which is at Cenchrea: 
2 That ye receive her in the Lord, as becometh saints, and that ye assist her in whatsoever business she hath need of you: for she hath been a succourer of many, and of myself also.
--Romans 16:1-2 (KJV)

The NIV translation renders it this way:

1 I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a deacon of the church in Cenchreae.

2 I ask you to receive her in the Lord in a way worthy of his people and to give her any help she may need from you, for she has been the benefactor of many people, including me.

So was Phoebe a deacon or merely a church helper, a servant? And notice that she is to receive help, not give it.

According to Strong's concordance, the Greek word used in the relevant passage is number 1249. Here's the definition:
servant, minister, a person who renders help to others, in some contexts with an implication of lower status; also transliterated as "deacon," a trusted officer of helps and service in the local church

(Emphasis mine.)

Paul uses the 1249 version translated as 'deacons' or servant in Philipians 1:1, 1Timothy 3:8 and 1Timothy 3:12. That word in the Greek is diakonos. But there is another word which is translated as deacon or servant that Paul uses to describe deacons, even his servant Timothy, and it's almost the same word: diakoneo. So what's the difference?

Was Phoebe "just" a servant or was she a leader to boot? What if Paul made an exception to his rule about suffering women to speak in the church? Could he do that? Was he allowed by his master, The Lord Jesus the Christ to do that?

Let's see by concentrating on what we know to be true and by inferring from that.

Paul was a servant of our Lord Jesus the Christ who was God in the flesh. Did God make exceptions to His prescriptions for His servants? Let's check it out.

In Exodus 13, God says that the eldest child (male) is the anointed one--the heir of a given family. This concept is called primogeniture.

But was Isaac Abraham's eldest? No. Ishmael was.

Was Jacob/Israel Isaac's eldest? No. Esau was.

Was Judah Jacob's eldest? No. Reuben was. (1 Chron. 5:1)

Was David Jesse's eldest? No.

Were either Solomon or Nathan David's eldest? No. David had many other older sons.

And was Jesus the Christ's earthly line from the eldest male child of David? No. He was descended from David's youngest, Nathan.

Let's see if God made exceptions to some of His other rules.

In Deuteronomy 7:1-3, God told the Israelites not to marry the Gentiles in the area.

But what of Rahab the harlot--an Ammonite and David's great grandmother--and of Ruth the Moabitess, David's grandmother who, by the way, is the only Gentile who has a book in the Old Testament named after her?

God does what He wants to do when necessary--and when He wants to demonstrate a principle to humankind (c.f. the marriage of Ruth and Boaz which can be analogized with the relationship between Christ and His Gentile bride: the Church). And because He gave human beings free will, sometimes the human beings who are anointed by Him will fail Him. When that happens, God moves to Plan B--and God always has a Plan B.

With respect to female pastors, I think that most women are not suited to for that role. Most of us are too emotional--the way God made us. And even those of us who are not too emotional to be pastors have higher, God-prescribed callings: to be wives and mothers.

But there are a very few women who are able to keep their emotions in check and who don't have the responsibilities involving their husbands and their children. I think that God sometimes calls those very few to lead.

Here's how you know who they are:

1. They are not beset by the previously-mentioned higher responsibilities, and,
2. Their subject matter is the Word of God and topics related and that only.

That last requirement is a must for male pastors as well, of course.

For the most part, Paul was right about women, in his time, in modern times, and in every time period in between. But Paul wasn't God and the former most certainly knew his limitations. God can do what He wants with whom He wants—this is inherent of the concept of sovereignty. It's up to each follower of Jesus the Christ to see what God's will is and that will can only be determined by talking (prayer) and, most importantly, listening (reading the Bible). Mix that with a huge dose of humility.

Here's a revelation, one that is not so original: God is not a legalist; He is the Law.

Monday, January 13, 2014

Re-Post: Never Follow a Lunatic

Originally posted at Da Tech Guy Blog on January 7, 2014. Yes, I'm quite busy today.

Over at American Thinker, Rick Moran comments upon the latest acts of devotion in the bromance between former NBA player/infamous weirdo Dennis Rodman and North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un. This time, Rodman has enlisted other former NBA players to join him for an All-sort-of-Star game in a place chock full of prison and labor camps; a place where electricity and food are reserved for the nomenklatura, or whatever the Korean-language designation is for the elite of the Hermit Kingdom.
Hall of Fame basketball player Dennis Rodman didn't much like the questions about his "basketball diplomacy" with North Korea coming from CNN host Chris Cuomo. So the former Detroit Pistons "bad boy" lit up the screen with a screaming tirade directed at Cuomo who only wanted to know if Rodman would bring up the case of American Kenneth Bae held for more than a year by the North Koreans for his missionary work.
From Mediate:
Let us know why this man is being held?’ If you can help them, will you take the opportunity?” Cuomo asked.
“The one thing about politics, Kenneth Bae did one thing. If you understand — if you understand what Kenneth Bae did,” Rodman said with a pause, then added “Do you understand what he did? In this country?”
“What did he do?” Cuomo said. “You tell me.”
“You tell me,” Rodman shouted. “You tell me. Why is he held captive?”
“They haven’t released any charges,” Cuomo said. “They haven’t released any reason.”
“I would love to speak on this,” Rodman said, again waving Smith off.
“Go ahead,” Cuomo urged.
Instead, Rodman went off on Cuomo for the remainder of the interview, screaming at him to recognize the sacrifice being made by his fellow players.
The video is available at both links.

Here's the thing: why would anyone expect a guy with demonstrable mental issues to care about political prisoners or tyrannies? And like all too many professional athletes--like the other sheep he's leading--he cares only about being kowtowed to--since retirement, not much of that anymore for any of these guys. Enter the basketball fan, Kim Jong Un.

So now, in Rodman's warped mind, Kim is his friend and anyone who has angered his friend is an enemy and must be wrong, morality be damned. It's gangster logic and lunatic reasoning, the two not necessarily being mutually exclusive.

Rick says that Rodman's mental stability is questionable. No it isn't. He's nuts and has been for a long time.

Rodman's first team was the Detroit Pistons, whose coach, the late Chuck Daly, was a surrogate father to him. Rumor has it that Coach Daly would make sure that his All-Star defense-man took his medication. But after Daly retired and Rodman was traded, the latter seemed to come off the spool and, if the rumors about the medication are true, there remained no one to keep him accountable in that area. In the years following came the tattoos, the piercings, the dyed hair, the off-the-wall behavior...and the wedding dress. (Warning: have eye bleach handy, though he looks strangely...pretty. Strangely, being the operative word.)

So we have a former athlete with a suspected personality disorder leading several other former athletes of equal political ignorance and arrogance to a charity benefit in North Korea--probably the worst country to ever be caught in either accidentally or on purpose. One wonders if these scarily uninformed and uncaring men are being lulled into becoming prisoners themselves. Wouldn't that be a great propaganda coup for the ever more unhinged Kim Jong Un? Or maybe they are being groomed for something even more sinister...

They are pretty hungry over there.




GoFundMe: Arlen's Harem
GoFundMe: The Kenya Project

Monday, January 6, 2014

Re-Post: Rapist Logic

Originally posted at Da Tech Guy Blog on December 31, 2013.

On Christmas Eve, former presidential candidate Mitt Romney offered a photo of himself, his wife Ann, and their gazillion grandchildren.
In response to the photo, an MSNBC panel, conducted by the infamous Melissa Harris-Perry, proceeded to mock one of the grandchildren, young Kieran Romney, who is adopted and black.
"One of these things is not like the others, one of these things just isn’t the same,” panelist Pia Glenn offered as a caption for the photo, which the Romneys tweeted on Christmas Eve. (Lyrics of the original Sesame Street song are, “One of these things just doesn’t belong.”)
“And that little baby, front and center, would be the one,” Glenn said.
Comedian Dean Obeidallah joked that the baby is a token.
“It really sums up the diversity of the Republican party and the RNC, where they have the whole convention and they find the one black person.”
Of course, these people were excoriated, and why not? Good grief, it's like reading the banter of elementary school children! And the panelists show themselves to be what they claim to denounce: those who would isolate a child who is externally different from most of his family members--than most of his countrymen.

After taking a well-deserved Internet pummeling, Harris-Perry--who is half white and half black herself--put forth an apology.
Now, she is taking an Internet beating for that, but that's just gratuitous.

But there's something even more disturbing than the behavior of Harris-Perry and company. That something is the logic implicit CNN's Dr. Marc Lamont Hill's commentary on this incident. From Right Scoop:

Dr. Hill:
Some would say maybe that it’s an exploitative picture that they're exploiting the kid by hauling out this black person …
Embedded in this seemingly ridiculous notion is a frightening idea: that Kieran Romney's race was bound to be mocked and that his grandparents, knowing that he is different, set him up for ridicule by publicly acknowledging him as their grandchild.

The notion of "some," that the Romneys are exploiting the child by including him in a family photo and by sharing it, is merely a foundation--a fabricated pretext to shift the blame from the MSNBC panel to the Romneys for the actions of the former.

The Romneys should have never post the photo; or they should have never included the child in such a photo. But because they did, the Romneys deserved what they got from the MSNBC panel...according to Dr. Hill's logic.

"You deserve to be assaulted because you tempted us by wearing that short skirt/being out too late at night/leaving your meat uncovered. Wear a burka."

"You and your grandson deserve what you got. He got mocked because you showed him to us. Don't try to exploit him again by include him in pictures with your white grandchildren and we won't be tempted to mock him or you."

Right?

Right. The buck-passing never stops with these people.

(h/t The Other McCain)



Monday Morning Reading--January 6, 2014

Were the sacrifices in Iraq in vain?
Kaepernick goes sleeveless
Facebook News Feed History of the World: World War I to World War II
Girl Scouts Suggest Abortion Activist Wendy Davis for “Woman of the Year”
Romney: Apology accepted, but …
Detroit Police Chief Voices Support for Concealed Carry
Another summer in Antarctica
The Right as ‘The Other’
The Eve of Distraction
Jail survey: 7 in 10 felons register as Democrats

Saturday, January 4, 2014

It's a Trap--Reboot

I will be to intermittently featuring old posts from my political blog, baldilocks, and from my Christian blog, Turn not to the Right Hand nor to the Left. As I said in the last post,  the old baldilocks site is still available to the public, but TNTTRHNTTL is not; I only have it on my hard drive.

Before, I thought it was best to separate my Christian faith walk into another blog site, but I have changed my mind. The fact that Jesus is my Lord and my Savior is integral in my offline life, and so it shall be online.

The original version of this post was offered at TNTTRHNTTL on November 7, 2010. This version is edited yet again and has a couple of additional paragraphs. During the time in which I composed the old version, I was trying to free myself from a very toxic relationship and what follows below are concepts which I knew in my head to be true. However, it took a little while after that for these things to be cemented into my heart.

*****

Recently, a friend mentioned the concept of being “caught up”--being “in love”—that which is defined as Eros, "passionate love in the narrow sphere of sexual desire and longing."   Since that conversation, I have been thinking about how we sometimes call ourselves being “in love” with another and how such relationships almost always fail when one or both parties fall out of "love."

Much of what we call being “in love” is, in reality, delusional selfishness if the other two types of love--agape and phileo--are not shared between the two parties.  Minus friendship and, most importantly, minus the desire for growth in the Holy Spirit for one’s beloved, Eros is mere fantasy and when that fantasy fades in the face of reality and you find that you really don’t like the other person and you really don’t care whether that person lives or dies—or whether that person will have to experience the Second Death, the relationship ends.

It seems to me that when a relationship is based solely on Eros, two people aren’t really having a relationship with each other.  On the contrary, each individual is having a relationship with himself or herself.  

At first, neither person wants to see the “beloved” with characteristics apart from those which personal fantasy projects; and we certainly know the definition of projection: “the attribution of one's own ideas, feelings, or attitudes to other people or to objects.”  He is relating to his fantasies—most likely sexual—and projecting them onto her.  She is relating to her fantasies—most likely emotional and/or status-related—and projecting them onto him.  Initially, neither person sees the other as a separate individual with needs and wants of their own.  One might as well masturbate.

Inevitably, fantasy gives way to reality and the “beloved” turns out to be a real person who is different than our fantasy man/woman.  And when fantasy has been disabused, it can sometimes get ugly.  As I said to my friend, when we discover that the person is different than our fantasies—when we discover that the other person is a real person rather than our self-created phantom--we often get angry at that person for not being what our fantasy is or we keep trying to make that person into our fantasy.  

Both are losing propositions.

The Bible calls this “vain imagination” and it is necessary to my point to give the definition of the adjective ‘vain:’ “having no real value : idle, worthless .”  Additionally, the pertinent definition of the noun ‘vanity’ is useful:  “inflated pride in oneself or one's appearance : conceit.”  (Emphasis mine.)

It always seems to come back to pride, doesn’t it?

I once heard someone liken an intimate relation between a man and woman--read: marriage--to a properly baked cake with icing. The relationship is the cake with proper ingredients--spiritual love and a fully-formed friendship--and sex is the icing.

An insufficiently baked cake will taste awful and will melt the icing. And icing with no cake tastes sweet--at first. But after a short period of time, one becomes sick of it.

At any rate, this concept of being “in love” seem to be an inversion of one of Jesus Christ’s two greatest commandments: to love one’s neighbor as one loves oneself.  If you know that you have needs, wants and desires, you can be sure that others who you may claim to love have them as well—and you can be sure that many of those needs, wants and desires are different from your own.

Therefore, if you are using another person to gratify your own personal desires--physical or otherwise--regardless of his/her own and when your desires have been sated, you walk away, you are committing a grave sin, almost an act of hatred.  You are treating that person as an animal or a thing and not as a sentient being.  And the irony of this is, the person to whom you are doing the greatest harm is yourself—your own soul.  Repeatedly hurting others and being hurt in this manner builds up deafness to the Word of God and to the Holy Spirit contained in the hearing thereof—it produces fear rather than faith and we all know the origin of fear.

We see this pattern over and over again in so-called love relationships—using others to gratify oneself or to promote self in the eyes of other human beings.  People who are familiar with the biblical proscription of sex outside of marriage but don't want to follow it seem to think that God is trying to keep us from having fun.  But, personal experience and observation should tell us otherwise—that God prescribes this standard to keep us from hurting each other and hurting ourselves.

And, the “fun” waiting to be had can be so much richer and fulfilling when one cherishes the person having that fun also—when one loves and likes the real person’s spirit and soul rather than relating to the phantom in one's own head. 

I've experienced this only once.

I pray I will again.

Old Blog

I just cancelled my Typepad account but my old blog is still available in microblog form under this URL.

Friday, January 3, 2014

Fueled

Thank you, for the coffee, friends. Will be working all night!

Kaboom Again

If you didn't read Ace's instant classic back in September, he has reposted it. I just read it for the first time and...I wish I had enough talent to seamlessly mix that much humor and neuroses. Anyhow, go forth and read.

Still Coffee Blegging: Creamer? (UPDATED)

Mary got me a Starbucks gift card and David helped fund Arlen's Harem--the funding of which I won't see until Monday. So one thing is still needed to hold me over until next week: creamer/half-and-half/milk.

Sure, others have bigger fund-raisers; I have and will have bigger fund-raisers. But today, right now, I need the complement for my go-juice. That's it. That's all. Use Paypal.